mtrapier@prod500 ~/Desktop/test $ make && ./GPHFATest cc -std=c99 -pedantic -Wall -o GPHFATest GPHFATest.c GeneralHashFunctions.o -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Speed test with 10000000 loop Index Hash Name STM ETM EXT HPS 0 RSHash 252473028 255787564 3.31 3017013.54 1 PJWHash 255787625 260715030 4.93 2029465.81 2 ELFHash 260715124 266130561 5.42 1846573.05 3 BKDRHash 266130660 269310539 3.18 3144773.75 4 SDBMHash 269310626 272172184 2.86 3494599.79 5 DJBHash 272172223 274582796 2.41 4148391.27 6 DEKHash 274582868 276952781 2.37 4219564.18 7 BPHash 276952820 279312673 2.36 4237552.08 8 FNVHash 279312761 282890292 3.58 2795223.86 9 APHash 282890370 286404914 3.51 2845319.34 10 StpdHash 286405011 288797336 2.39 4180034.07 11 ThibHash 288797426 290852921 2.06 4865008.19 mtrapier@prod500 ~/Desktop/test $ make && ./GPHFATest make: Rien à faire pour « all ». -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Speed test with 10000000 loop Index Hash Name STM ETM EXT HPS 0 RSHash 294256136 297539010 3.28 3046111.43 1 PJWHash 297539106 302442713 4.90 2039315.14 2 ELFHash 302442749 307792876 5.35 1869114.51 3 BKDRHash 307792914 310943942 3.15 3173567.48 4 SDBMHash 310943979 313771009 2.83 3537281.17 5 DJBHash 313771046 316175117 2.40 4159610.93 6 DEKHash 316175155 318531509 2.36 4243844.52 7 BPHash 318531546 320884391 2.35 4250173.73 8 FNVHash 320884426 324475608 3.59 2784598.50 9 APHash 324475645 327948631 3.47 2879366.63 10 StpdHash 327948667 330323512 2.37 4210801.13 11 ThibHash 330323548 332360510 2.04 4909271.75
Ta fonction a au moins un avantage, c'est la plus rapide
(STM = StartTime en µSec, ETM = EndTime en µSec, EXT = Execution Time en S et HPS = Hash Par Seconde)