Are remote workers more productive? That’s the wrong question.TL;DR : le mouvement "retour au boulot en présentiel" est moins basé sur des données sérieuses que sur des opinions entachées de préjugés et de conflits d'intérêt.
Stack Overflow
Ten years ago, I got my first non-academic job as a market researcher and writer. The commute was only about 30 minutes in each direction, but parking was expensive and public transportation wasn’t an option. I rarely had meetings; I communicated with my manager and my colleagues—all seated in the same open-plan office space—almost exclusively via email and chat.
After several months of noise-canceling headphones, I asked my manager if I could work from home sometimes. From a 2023 perspective, he reacted as if I’d made a ridiculous request, like reducing my working hours to 15 minutes every other day or keeping a baby tiger under my desk. He eventually agreed to a trial period, but the solution that seemed obvious to me was a hard sell for him.
A decade of technological progress and one pandemic later, there’s much less reflexive resistance to the idea of working remotely. But over the last year or so, especially after the official end of the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency in the United States, some of that hostility toward working from home (we’re lazy! we wear pajamas!) has returned. Headlines, blogs, internal message boards, and LinkedIn feeds are dense with discussion about whether we should all go back to the office, continue working remotely, or navigate some kind of middle ground.
Sinon, un point de l'article qui concerne au moins certains d'entre nous :
People with disabilities and advocacy groups have also warned that RTO mandates disproportionately hurt workers with disabilities, including neurodivergent people.
